alimarko

R I C K S A N T O R U M 2 0 1 2: I am so fucking tired... →

ricksantorum-2012:

hannahisawful:

alimarko:

… of hearing this stupid, privileged argument that people use to justify their blatant oppression:

“It’s just a word. Words can be reclaimed, and only have meaning through context. You aren’tallowed to be offended or upset by that highly offensive word/slur I just used because I didn’t mean it that way!”

I hate, hate, hate this argument. Just the other day, I made a new acquaintance who uses “gay” to mean stupid (needless to say, we won’t be friends). I asked him to stop, and he spewed the above bullshit. And let me say this loud and clear: You, as the privileged, heterosexual person do not have the ability or right to dictate the meaning of a slur. You do not get to tell anybody else that they’re not allowed to be offended by it. You, a person with no claim to this word, who has never been called this word (or other similar ones) in an offensive setting, do not get to “redefine” this word.How could you possibly think that it would be okay for you to say “Well, in this context I’m using “gay” to mean stupid, not homosexual!!!!” You cannot deny the original meaning of this word, you are not allowed to further insult the oppressed by taking away the original meaning. And finally, even if it were somehow okay for you to try to redefine a word you have no claim for, it would beimpossible. Words have connotations, histories. Language can and does oppress, restrict, and belittle. 


THIS THIS THIS THIS

See also: White teenagers who call their friends “nigga”.

I like how this entire libtard post is just, “White people have no right to say anything”, “Heterosexual people have no right to say anything”. Welcome to Obama’s America, folks. Where minorities can oppress you, gays will force their lifestyles onto you and religion will be banned. All in the name of political correctness. 

What’s next? Will these people call for the holocaust of white heterosexual Christians soon? Who knows. I’m prepared for just about anything.

Hey, Rick Santorum. Yeah, I’m talking to you (or at the very least, your tumblr). That original post by me? Came from a white, heterosexual christian “libtard” (good job using another offensive slur by referencing the word “retard!”). AND GUESS WHAT? I STILL KNOW THAT OFFENDING AND OPPRESSING PEOPLE IS WRONG!

Welcome to Obama’s America, where we (ideally) would stop degrading, oppressing, and harming minority groups simply based on their lack of privilege. Welcome to Obama’s America, where I just out-reasoned you and your only retort is to complain that you’re not allowed to hurt anyone’s feelings anymore. GET OVER IT.  I’ve never been more supportive of Obama 2012 than right now.

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again. There is no “war on Christianity.” There is no war against whites, against heterosexuals, or men. NONE OF THOSE GROUPS CAN BE “OPPRESSED.” There is no systematic oppression against those majority groups, because that would defy the definition of “oppression” being prejudice + power. Those groups have no power over you.

You are not being oppressed for being heterosexual, white, or christian. Take it from someone who is all three, and who still doesn’t subscribe to your idiotic idea of what America should be.


I am so fucking tired…

… of hearing this stupid, privileged argument that people use to justify their blatant oppression:

“It’s just a word. Words can be reclaimed, and only have meaning through context. You aren’t allowed to be offended or upset by that highly offensive word/slur I just used because I didn’t mean it that way!”

I hate, hate, hate this argument. Just the other day, I made a new acquaintance who uses “gay” to mean stupid (needless to say, we won’t be friends). I asked him to stop, and he spewed the above bullshit. And let me say this loud and clear: You, as the privileged, heterosexual person do not have the ability or right to dictate the meaning of a slur. You do not get to tell anybody else that they’re not allowed to be offended by it. You, a person with no claim to this word, who has never been called this word (or other similar ones) in an offensive setting, do not get to “redefine” this word. How could you possibly think that it would be okay for you to say “Well, in this context I’m using “gay” to mean stupid, not homosexual!!!!” You cannot deny the original meaning of this word, you are not allowed to further insult the oppressed by taking away the original meaning. And finally, even if it were somehow okay for you to try to redefine a word you have no claim for, it would be impossible. Words have connotations, histories. Language can and does oppress, restrict, and belittle. 



(TW: Sexual abuse, victim-blaming, slut-shaming) To all the people I know or meet or hear of (almost always men) who tell me that there is no need for feminism…

…or that there is no sexism or that women are equal to men in every way and that I’m imagining things, I say this:

Look at the past week, the past month. Look at how hard we have to fight just to be allowed our rights as people. Look at how hard politicians like Rick Santorum are fighting to keep us from accessing healthcare. Look at how entitled politicians and men like Rush Limbaugh feel to talk and make assumptions about our personal lives and our sexual activities and our health. Look how men are congratulated for having as many partners as they can find but women are shamed for being anything less than virgins unless they are married. Look how our bodies can be sexualized and critiqued made to feel inadequate all at the same time. Look at the statistics of sexual violence against women that tell us that 1 in 4 women in the world have been sexually abused. Look at how many of those victims are told that they deserved what they got, that it’s their fault. Look at how much we have to struggle just to convince ourselves that we are free.


I’ve had enough of it. All of it. If you’re a woman, and you don’t care, open your eyes. If you’re a man and you don’t care, why don’t you call your mom or your sister or your girlfriend or your grandma or your female friends and explain to them why you don’t find their oppression important, significant, or worth fighting for.


I’ve had enough of this shit and if you don’t feel the same way, ask yourself why. I’m asking you right now, how much more do women have to suffer for you to care?


Watching Rick Santorum open his mouth makes me feel physically ill.

Like, no, fuck you. “Separation of Church and State” DOES NOT MEAN “my religion shouldn’t be affected by your government!” Nobody is telling religious people that they cannot have political beliefs or be involved in the public square. We are telling them that they cannot let their religion affect how this country is governed.

And wanting higher education for everyone makes you a snob? Extending the access to higher education is now a BAD THING? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?

Or right, because colleges are trying to “indoctrinate our college students into losing their faith.” 

Yeah, I fucking bet you’d care oh so much if a Muslim or Jewish or Buddhist student “lost their faith” while in college. Get the fuck out.


thegirlwhoatethemoon:

frankenstein-jones:

lettherebecramp:

weetz:

clopinette:

whims-of-a-feminist:

fydestinyhope:

gnawering:

alimarko:

(Find the original post with the above picture here.)
** TW: Objectification of women, rape apology, abortion **
Alright, feminist-bashers, misogynists, or just plain ignorant, oppressive people. Listen the fuck up.
Objectifying a woman is totally and completely different than a woman choosing for herself to apply any amount of make-up. The same thing goes for the personal choice of hairstyle or dress, or even career. The only instance when any of those things are harmfully “objectifying” is when a person has no choice in doing those things (or when they feel as if they have no choice, ie. a woman feeling that she is not valued or treated well enough without make-up on).
When I make the personal choice to wear any amount of make-up, I do it for myself. I’m not dressing for a man, or any other person I’m trying to impress. Which means I’m not looking for your comment of disapproval, no matter how big I paint on my cat eyes or on the days when I don’t wear any make-up at all. This is a personal choice, and I don’t give a fuck how you feel about it. I’m not doing it to objectify myself, I’m not doing it for anybody but me.
Why is it that a woman’s choices become the business of anyone she comes in contact with? Why am I to be judged for wearing lots of make-up (“you’re pretty, why don’t you wear less make-up?”) or for wearing none at all (“you look tired, are you sick?”). This is the same mentality that tells people that other choices a woman makes are meant to be judged by others. She wears short skirts? She must be a “slut,” which means if she is raped, you’ll be less likely to hold her rapist accountable. She has a situation that you don’t know about or understand, and for her own reason, chooses to get an abortion? Well, the people who know better have to step in and stop her, to force her to carry a fetus to term that could wreak havoc on her life, her health, and the lives of those around her.
Until the choices of women- from how much make-up she wears to the personal health decisions she makes- stop being considered public grounds for discussion and judgement, there will still be a need for feminism. So in conclusion, get your sexist, uninformed, misogynistic meme the fuck out of here.

But would heterosexual women really even care about putting on makeup if the earth was devoid of males?

I’d just like to add my personal story: I’m a heterosexual woman and I went to an all-girls boarding school for one semester. While I attended this school, I wore make-up and my favorite clothing styles everyday. Experimented with curly hair and shiny nail polish. Not for my friends. Not to please my teachers. Not for any boys, who obviously weren’t even there. And y’know what? I felt even more comfortable doing it around people who care less about how I look than the ones who possibly do. I didn’t do this to be looked at or to attract anybody, because honestly, being objectifyed is a disgusting feeling (unless you wanna get laid or something), being judged and degraded to your attractiveness in first or whatever place is just, fuck, not cool at all, no human being deserves this (unless they actually want to and ask you to).
Dressing up and experimenting with colours on your face and making yourself look how you really like it, inspired by whatever, is fun, is comfortable, is awesome. Is for yourself. x

Yeah most certainly there are plenty of people who do make up for themselves. For some it’s like an art. 
I personally sometimes just like to use make up. I’ve spent two hours with friends just experimenting back and forth. And not for the sake of anyone but me and fun.
of course i’m also no expert at make up but that’s o-kay.

Y’know what? I spent 38 minutes on makeup today. This is partly because I’m a klutz with liquid eyeliner and the Jack Sparrow look wasn’t working for me, but mostly for this reason: I damn well felt like it. Guys (or whoever, really) of the world: no aspect of my appearance has anything to do with you. If my eyelids are green and sparkly, it’s because I happen to like green and I want to match my Awesome Hat, not because I think you might find it attractive. Trust me, in those 38 minutes, the thought of what anyone else might think about today’s color scheme did not once cross my mind. Never does, never will.

LOL FUCK THIS NOISE
DONT TRY TO FIT ME INTO YOUR LITTLE MISOGYNISTIC BOX. I CAN BE A FEMINIST WITH GLITTER LIPGLOSS AND SHOW OFF MY TITS AND COME HOME AFTER WORK AND MAKE MY HUSBAND DINNER AND GIVE HIM BLOWJOBS AND GO TO UNIVERSITY AND PROVIDE FOR MY FAMILY AND LONG TO BE A STAY AT HOME MOTHER
AND ITS MY MOTHERFUCKING CHOICE TO BE AUTONOMOUSLY SEXY LAQUERED WITH MAKEUP SO EAT MY FIERCELY INDEPENDENT ASS

WE DON’T DRESS FOR YOU
FEMME AND FIERCE AS FUCK

this.
all of it.
there is absolutely zero i can add to this to drive the point home; it’s already been done by the people before me. and it’s spot the fuck on.

REBLOG FOREVER.  I WEAR MAKEUP FOR MYSELF, JERKS.

Reblogging my rant from forever ago with all of these wonderful comments and additions. Favorite: “FEMME AND FIERCE AS FUCK. “

I fucking love the feminist tumblr community. <3

thegirlwhoatethemoon:

frankenstein-jones:

lettherebecramp:

weetz:

clopinette:

whims-of-a-feminist:

fydestinyhope:

gnawering:

alimarko:

(Find the original post with the above picture here.)

** TW: Objectification of women, rape apology, abortion **

Alright, feminist-bashers, misogynists, or just plain ignorant, oppressive people. Listen the fuck up.

Objectifying a woman is totally and completely different than a woman choosing for herself to apply any amount of make-up. The same thing goes for the personal choice of hairstyle or dress, or even career. The only instance when any of those things are harmfully “objectifying” is when a person has no choice in doing those things (or when they feel as if they have no choice, ie. a woman feeling that she is not valued or treated well enough without make-up on).

When I make the personal choice to wear any amount of make-up, I do it for myself. I’m not dressing for a man, or any other person I’m trying to impress. Which means I’m not looking for your comment of disapproval, no matter how big I paint on my cat eyes or on the days when I don’t wear any make-up at all. This is a personal choice, and I don’t give a fuck how you feel about it. I’m not doing it to objectify myself, I’m not doing it for anybody but me.

Why is it that a woman’s choices become the business of anyone she comes in contact with? Why am I to be judged for wearing lots of make-up (“you’re pretty, why don’t you wear less make-up?”) or for wearing none at all (“you look tired, are you sick?”). This is the same mentality that tells people that other choices a woman makes are meant to be judged by others. She wears short skirts? She must be a “slut,” which means if she is raped, you’ll be less likely to hold her rapist accountable. She has a situation that you don’t know about or understand, and for her own reason, chooses to get an abortion? Well, the people who know better have to step in and stop her, to force her to carry a fetus to term that could wreak havoc on her life, her health, and the lives of those around her.

Until the choices of women- from how much make-up she wears to the personal health decisions she makes- stop being considered public grounds for discussion and judgement, there will still be a need for feminism. So in conclusion, get your sexist, uninformed, misogynistic meme the fuck out of here.

But would heterosexual women really even care about putting on makeup if the earth was devoid of males?

I’d just like to add my personal story: I’m a heterosexual woman and I went to an all-girls boarding school for one semester. While I attended this school, I wore make-up and my favorite clothing styles everyday. Experimented with curly hair and shiny nail polish. Not for my friends. Not to please my teachers. Not for any boys, who obviously weren’t even there. And y’know what? I felt even more comfortable doing it around people who care less about how I look than the ones who possibly do. I didn’t do this to be looked at or to attract anybody, because honestly, being objectifyed is a disgusting feeling (unless you wanna get laid or something), being judged and degraded to your attractiveness in first or whatever place is just, fuck, not cool at all, no human being deserves this (unless they actually want to and ask you to).

Dressing up and experimenting with colours on your face and making yourself look how you really like it, inspired by whatever, is fun, is comfortable, is awesome. Is for yourself. x

Yeah most certainly there are plenty of people who do make up for themselves. For some it’s like an art. 

I personally sometimes just like to use make up. I’ve spent two hours with friends just experimenting back and forth. And not for the sake of anyone but me and fun.

of course i’m also no expert at make up but that’s o-kay.

Y’know what? I spent 38 minutes on makeup today. This is partly because I’m a klutz with liquid eyeliner and the Jack Sparrow look wasn’t working for me, but mostly for this reason: I damn well felt like it. Guys (or whoever, really) of the world: no aspect of my appearance has anything to do with you. If my eyelids are green and sparkly, it’s because I happen to like green and I want to match my Awesome Hat, not because I think you might find it attractive. Trust me, in those 38 minutes, the thought of what anyone else might think about today’s color scheme did not once cross my mind. Never does, never will.

LOL FUCK THIS NOISE

DONT TRY TO FIT ME INTO YOUR LITTLE MISOGYNISTIC BOX. I CAN BE A FEMINIST WITH GLITTER LIPGLOSS AND SHOW OFF MY TITS AND COME HOME AFTER WORK AND MAKE MY HUSBAND DINNER AND GIVE HIM BLOWJOBS AND GO TO UNIVERSITY AND PROVIDE FOR MY FAMILY AND LONG TO BE A STAY AT HOME MOTHER

AND ITS MY MOTHERFUCKING CHOICE TO BE AUTONOMOUSLY SEXY LAQUERED WITH MAKEUP SO EAT MY FIERCELY INDEPENDENT ASS

WE DON’T DRESS FOR YOU

FEMME AND FIERCE AS FUCK

this.

all of it.

there is absolutely zero i can add to this to drive the point home; it’s already been done by the people before me. and it’s spot the fuck on.

REBLOG FOREVER.  I WEAR MAKEUP FOR MYSELF, JERKS.

Reblogging my rant from forever ago with all of these wonderful comments and additions. Favorite: “FEMME AND FIERCE AS FUCK. “

I fucking love the feminist tumblr community. <3


EXCUSE ME, BUT WHAT?

Because a guy is deemed &#8220;good&#8221; (which by the way, most &#8220;Nice Guys™&#8221; aren&#8217;t nice or good), any girl should automatically give him her time and affection? Because the personal choices of women are any of your business? Because you get to decide who other women pursue romantically? Oh, I&#8217;m sorry, when did that become any of your goddamned business?

You heard it there first, ladies. If a guy is nice to you, you owe him your time, attention, affection, love, body, or anything else he wants from you.

EXCUSE ME, BUT WHAT?

Because a guy is deemed “good” (which by the way, most “Nice Guys™” aren’t nice or good), any girl should automatically give him her time and affection? Because the personal choices of women are any of your business? Because you get to decide who other women pursue romantically? Oh, I’m sorry, when did that become any of your goddamned business?

You heard it there first, ladies. If a guy is nice to you, you owe him your time, attention, affection, love, body, or anything else he wants from you.

http://static.tumblr.com/othbyk8/BPollj1xq/tn-memes-no-face-of-course-not.jpg


feministsaresexist:

hannahisawful:

hannahisawful:

Your first mistake: Don’t ever, ever get confused and think you can tell me to stop posting about feminism on my blog. I don’t know what confused you and made you think that was remotely appropriate, but I’ll give you a second to be very embarrassed about that grave mistake you made before I go on. 
Women are oppressed. Men are not. Women always have been, men never have been. Never on this earth has a man been held down in society purely for being a man. A man can be held back if he’s a person of color, if he’s queer, or if he is poor — but never ever because he’s a man. I don’t advise anyone say anything badly of anyone, but there’s a difference between being rude towards oppressed group and being rude towards a person of privilege. Should anyone go around calling people “cracker”? Probably not, but it’s fucking no where NEAR as bad as the n-word, because white people have never, not once, been held down due to their race. Being called a “cracker” has never held white people down in society. I’ve said this a thousand times and I guess I’m going to have to keep saying it: READ ABOUT MALE PRIVILEGE BEFORE YOU EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER TALK TO ME EVER.
And, men do get a free pass when it comes to sex always, and to be quite fair, I don’t give a fuck what you don’t appreciate, because you don’t know what you’re talking about. Society has never, ever held the belief that women can fuck as much as they want, but if men do, they’re a slut. That has never been a thing. Ever. You know that shithead I reblogged earlier who claimed women are “lacking morals” and all that other shit? Yeah, tell me how many times anyone has said that about men who like to fuck. 
Want to know why there’s pressures on men, too? Because the media says that you need to be masculine; the worst thing you can be is a woman, be effeminate. Girls can totally be tomboys, but everyone wants to try to “fix” a boy who likes dolls and make-up. Take a second and think of the worst fucking insults you can use against a man. Jessica Valenti said this better than I did:“What’s the worst possible thing you can call a woman? Don’t hold back, now.You’re probably thinking of words like slut, whore, bitch, cunt (I told you not to hold back!), skank. Okay, now, what are the worst things you can call a guy? Fag, girl, bitch, pussy. I’ve even heard the term “mangina.” Notice anything? The worst thing you can call a girl is a girl. The worst thing you can call a guy is a girl. Being a woman is the ultimate insult. Now tell me that’s not royally fucked up.” I rest my case. 
And clearly you have no idea what the fuck feminism is, because it doesn’t just help women. Feminism is good for everyone. Misogyny hurts everyone. Patriarchy hurts everyone. Misogyny fucks over anyone with effeminate traits — whether those traits are actually being female or being a guy who likes stereotypically female things. 
I am not anti-men. I’d like to know where the fuck you got that one. Men are great, men are wonderful. I get excited when a man identifies as a feminist. My favorite person in the whole fucking world is Anthony, who is a man. And he’s the greatest person I’ve ever known. I don’t think lesser of anyone who happens to be a guy. The only men I hate are ones who fail to recognize their privilege — which, again, I heavily insist you further educate yourself on, because I only gave you the crash-course here — and think women should be second to them. And I hate women who are misogynistic, too. Don’t worry, my disdain doesn’t stop with hateful men, which I think you’d know if you’d been following me for more than five minutes, which makes me think you must be really new here.
Society has always favored the white, straight, cisgendered male. Society is geared towards them. It’s easier to get a job. When you get that job, you’ll make more money than women. If it’s a high-level, prestigious job, you are much more likely to be given that position than a woman. No one would ever assume you got your job because of your looks/didn’t get a job because of your looks. You’re less likely to be assaulted. You’re much less likely to be sexually assaulted. In fact, just just fucking read this.
I do respect men. Just not shitty men.
I don’t know whether to tell you to leave my blog and never, ever come back, or tell you to go through my archive and read every post I’ve ever made on sexism. Wow. Wow. 

Posting this again because people suck

Oh yay. Every ignorant thing that could ever be said in a post.
I’m not going to get much into talking, it would take me all day to cover the stupidity of this post.
Society has always catered to women. Always. Now, with female scholarships and affirmative action “helping” both women and minorities at the expense of men and whites and the company that just wants to hire who’s best for the job, and even during actual patriarchy. Actual patriarchy, meaning it no longer exists.
Men have always been disposable. During actual patriarchy, and even now, when they don’t get any respect for the things that they still do without the recognition that they used to get. And women wonder why men don’t want to take responsibility anymore. Female privilege is completely ignored, and women even had privilege during actual patriarchy.
I’ve covered the completely wrong Jessica Valenti quote before.
Lastly, my favorite: 

(Being a white man) You’re less likely to be assaulted.

I just….you’re absolutely fucking moronic. Because every crime is a hate crime? In 2010, there were only 517 hate crimes based on race alone. That’s pretty damn rare. Crime has always had predominantly male victims, excluding sexual assault. Look it up. Anywhere. Assault, muggings, and murder aren’t usually crimes based on race. Assault and muggings are due to vulnerability. If you’re going to rob and/or beat the shit out of someone, or murder them without a weapon, even if you are racist, are you going to pick the skinny ass white dude or the big black dude? You’re going to pick the skinny ass white dude, because racist or not, you want to be the winner in that situation. That’s assuming that all murderers like murdering random people, which more than likely isn’t the case, since there’s usually personal motive (which we’ve established is rarely racist) rather than being a psychopathic serial killer. And don’t even try to pull out domestic violence between men and women, because it’s equal.
Let’s add “feminists are completely uninformed” or even, “feminists only see the side that makes women out to be the victims in every single situation” to the long list of reasons I’m not and never will be a feminist.

What the fuck are you talking about, feministsaresexists? I mean, I guess I can&#8217;t expect much better coming from that name, but still&#8230; at least make a coherent argument and get your facts straight!

&#8220;Society has always catered to women.&#8221; I&#8217;m sorry, but what? What history did you learn in school? What world have you been living in? Sure, things are better than they were a hundred years ago (when women couldn&#8217;t vote, or own property unless married, and a slew of other things), but saying that women are the favored group over men? I honestly have no idea where you got that.

One major reason this is untrue is that women are far FAR more likely to be sexually assaulted than men. You mentioned that Jessica Valenti quote about white men being less likely to be assaulted? It&#8217;s true in both the case of sexual assault and non-sexual assault, and I interpret that quote as talking about both. And in the case of rape, please check out this site, which reports that:
 
&#8220;1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed rape; 2.8% attempted rape).
17.7 million American women have been victims of attempted or completed rape.
9 of every 10 rape victims were female in 2003.&#8221;

Those are compared to the male rates of sexual assault:
&#8220;About 3% of American men — or 1 in 33 — have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.&#8221;
So while there a many male victims and they deserve just as much support as female victims, it&#8217;s pretty obvious that sexual assault occurs far more frequently to women (1 in 6 vs. 1 in 33). How can you say that women are favored (or even equal) in society if we must face the reality that one in six of us will be assaulted in our lifetimes, and that usually the rapist will be a man? And of course, this number goes up for minority women&#8230; which brings me to my next topic&#8230;

Do you realize that you cited a website saying the opposite of what you were arguing? You said that race crimes are uncommon, that only 517 occur per year in the same sentence that you quote an article that reports a much higher number. If you had actually read that article, you would&#8217;ve noticed that in 2010, there were 6,628 hate crimes, and that 70% of all race-related hate crimes targeted blacks. In fact, the title of the article was &#8220;Hate Crimes Target Blacks in 70 Percent of Race-Based Cases.&#8221; You&#8217;re starting to look pretty damn ignorant right now, especially for the person calling those of us who care about these issues stupid. You didn&#8217;t even fucking read the article that you slapped onto your half-assed, oppressive argument and expected us not to notice? Shame on you, because feminists know better.

Now, I could go on and on about why else you&#8217;re just completely wrong. I could tell you about the wage gap, the war on reproductive rights, the slut-shaming, the sexual double standards. But I don&#8217;t see the point in continuing to argue with someone who doesn&#8217;t even read the articles they link to and tries to spew the utter nonsense above. View Larger

feministsaresexist:

hannahisawful:

hannahisawful:

Your first mistake: Don’t ever, ever get confused and think you can tell me to stop posting about feminism on my blog. I don’t know what confused you and made you think that was remotely appropriate, but I’ll give you a second to be very embarrassed about that grave mistake you made before I go on. 

Women are oppressed. Men are not. Women always have been, men never have been. Never on this earth has a man been held down in society purely for being a man. A man can be held back if he’s a person of color, if he’s queer, or if he is poor — but never ever because he’s a man. I don’t advise anyone say anything badly of anyone, but there’s a difference between being rude towards oppressed group and being rude towards a person of privilege. Should anyone go around calling people “cracker”? Probably not, but it’s fucking no where NEAR as bad as the n-word, because white people have never, not once, been held down due to their race. Being called a “cracker” has never held white people down in society. I’ve said this a thousand times and I guess I’m going to have to keep saying it: READ ABOUT MALE PRIVILEGE BEFORE YOU EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER TALK TO ME EVER.

And, men do get a free pass when it comes to sex always, and to be quite fair, I don’t give a fuck what you don’t appreciate, because you don’t know what you’re talking about. Society has never, ever held the belief that women can fuck as much as they want, but if men do, they’re a slut. That has never been a thing. Ever. You know that shithead I reblogged earlier who claimed women are “lacking morals” and all that other shit? Yeah, tell me how many times anyone has said that about men who like to fuck. 

Want to know why there’s pressures on men, too? Because the media says that you need to be masculine; the worst thing you can be is a woman, be effeminate. Girls can totally be tomboys, but everyone wants to try to “fix” a boy who likes dolls and make-up. Take a second and think of the worst fucking insults you can use against a man. Jessica Valenti said this better than I did:
“What’s the worst possible thing you can call a woman? Don’t hold back, now.You’re probably thinking of words like slut, whore, bitch, cunt (I told you not to hold back!), skank.
Okay, now, what are the worst things you can call a guy? Fag, girl, bitch, pussy. I’ve even heard the term “mangina.”
Notice anything? The worst thing you can call a girl is a girl. The worst thing you can call a guy is a girl. Being a woman is the ultimate insult. Now tell me that’s not royally fucked up.” 
I rest my case. 

And clearly you have no idea what the fuck feminism is, because it doesn’t just help women. Feminism is good for everyone. Misogyny hurts everyone. Patriarchy hurts everyone. Misogyny fucks over anyone with effeminate traits — whether those traits are actually being female or being a guy who likes stereotypically female things. 

I am not anti-men. I’d like to know where the fuck you got that one. Men are great, men are wonderful. I get excited when a man identifies as a feminist. My favorite person in the whole fucking world is Anthony, who is a man. And he’s the greatest person I’ve ever known. I don’t think lesser of anyone who happens to be a guy. The only men I hate are ones who fail to recognize their privilege — which, again, I heavily insist you further educate yourself on, because I only gave you the crash-course here — and think women should be second to them. And I hate women who are misogynistic, too. Don’t worry, my disdain doesn’t stop with hateful men, which I think you’d know if you’d been following me for more than five minutes, which makes me think you must be really new here.

Society has always favored the white, straight, cisgendered male. Society is geared towards them. It’s easier to get a job. When you get that job, you’ll make more money than women. If it’s a high-level, prestigious job, you are much more likely to be given that position than a woman. No one would ever assume you got your job because of your looks/didn’t get a job because of your looks. You’re less likely to be assaulted. You’re much less likely to be sexually assaulted. In fact, just just fucking read this.

I do respect men. Just not shitty men.

I don’t know whether to tell you to leave my blog and never, ever come back, or tell you to go through my archive and read every post I’ve ever made on sexism. Wow. Wow. 

Posting this again because people suck

Oh yay. Every ignorant thing that could ever be said in a post.

I’m not going to get much into talking, it would take me all day to cover the stupidity of this post.

Society has always catered to women. Always. Now, with female scholarships and affirmative action “helping” both women and minorities at the expense of men and whites and the company that just wants to hire who’s best for the job, and even during actual patriarchy. Actual patriarchy, meaning it no longer exists.

Men have always been disposable. During actual patriarchy, and even now, when they don’t get any respect for the things that they still do without the recognition that they used to get. And women wonder why men don’t want to take responsibility anymoreFemale privilege is completely ignored, and women even had privilege during actual patriarchy.

I’ve covered the completely wrong Jessica Valenti quote before.

Lastly, my favorite: 

(Being a white man) You’re less likely to be assaulted.

I just….you’re absolutely fucking moronic. Because every crime is a hate crime? In 2010, there were only 517 hate crimes based on race alone. That’s pretty damn rare. Crime has always had predominantly male victims, excluding sexual assault. Look it up. Anywhere. Assault, muggings, and murder aren’t usually crimes based on race. Assault and muggings are due to vulnerability. If you’re going to rob and/or beat the shit out of someone, or murder them without a weapon, even if you are racist, are you going to pick the skinny ass white dude or the big black dude? You’re going to pick the skinny ass white dude, because racist or not, you want to be the winner in that situation. That’s assuming that all murderers like murdering random people, which more than likely isn’t the case, since there’s usually personal motive (which we’ve established is rarely racist) rather than being a psychopathic serial killer. And don’t even try to pull out domestic violence between men and women, because it’s equal.

Let’s add “feminists are completely uninformed” or even, “feminists only see the side that makes women out to be the victims in every single situation” to the long list of reasons I’m not and never will be a feminist.

What the fuck are you talking about, feministsaresexists? I mean, I guess I can’t expect much better coming from that name, but still… at least make a coherent argument and get your facts straight!

“Society has always catered to women.” I’m sorry, but what? What history did you learn in school? What world have you been living in? Sure, things are better than they were a hundred years ago (when women couldn’t vote, or own property unless married, and a slew of other things), but saying that women are the favored group over men? I honestly have no idea where you got that.

One major reason this is untrue is that women are far FAR more likely to be sexually assaulted than men. You mentioned that Jessica Valenti quote about white men being less likely to be assaulted? It’s true in both the case of sexual assault and non-sexual assault, and I interpret that quote as talking about both. And in the case of rape, please check out this site, which reports that:

 

“1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed rape; 2.8% attempted rape).

17.7 million American women have been victims of attempted or completed rape.

9 of every 10 rape victims were female in 2003.”

Those are compared to the male rates of sexual assault:

“About 3% of American men — or 1 in 33 — have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.

So while there a many male victims and they deserve just as much support as female victims, it’s pretty obvious that sexual assault occurs far more frequently to women (1 in 6 vs. 1 in 33). How can you say that women are favored (or even equal) in society if we must face the reality that one in six of us will be assaulted in our lifetimes, and that usually the rapist will be a man? And of course, this number goes up for minority women… which brings me to my next topic…

Do you realize that you cited a website saying the opposite of what you were arguing? You said that race crimes are uncommon, that only 517 occur per year in the same sentence that you quote an article that reports a much higher number. If you had actually read that article, you would’ve noticed that in 2010, there were 6,628 hate crimes, and that 70% of all race-related hate crimes targeted blacks. In fact, the title of the article was “Hate Crimes Target Blacks in 70 Percent of Race-Based Cases.” You’re starting to look pretty damn ignorant right now, especially for the person calling those of us who care about these issues stupid. You didn’t even fucking read the article that you slapped onto your half-assed, oppressive argument and expected us not to notice? Shame on you, because feminists know better.

Now, I could go on and on about why else you’re just completely wrong. I could tell you about the wage gap, the war on reproductive rights, the slut-shaming, the sexual double standards. But I don’t see the point in continuing to argue with someone who doesn’t even read the articles they link to and tries to spew the utter nonsense above.

(Source: sainthannah)


6 reasons why feminists are destroying women and society: A.K.A. 6 Reasons Why You Clearly Don't Understand Feminism and Need to Stop Being Oppressive. →

corruptedmindd:

1. Feminism makes women think all they need to do to succeed in life is “be a woman.” Today’s women think they deserve anything and everything just because they’re women. The result is a woman who is entitled when it comes to receiving good grades, jobs, or relationships. When she fails at gaining these, she blames both men and her feminine condition instead of herself.

2. Feminists are proud to be ugly. Go to the city and what do you see? Obese women that are either bald or have hair above their ears, loose clothing, and flip-flops. Feminism has taught women that it’s okay for them to look like they just rolled out of bed. Men are attracted to beauty and always will be. Next thing you know, women will appear in public wearing pajamas.

3. Feminists are stuck up, argumentative, and difficult. Feminism has taught women to “speak your mind,” another saying for “bitch about everything.” They will let nothing rest that they mildly disagree with, and would rather start World War III about some insignificant shit than simply changing the topic.

4. Feminists have trouble finding a partner that is equal or above to their level. Feminism has given women more money while taking away their biological need to have a family. They naturally find it difficult to find a man of lower means than themselves, so they simply remain single until they die, with nothing but cats to keep them company. Women are making more money, men have limited work options, threatening the very fabric of society. Great job, feminists.

5. Feminists overvalue alpha males. It is 2012, and the majority of men have been brainwashed by the feminist message, therefor making them the most pussified creatures in the world.

6. Feminists are going to be unfit mothers who don’t know how to take care of a household.Have you ever dated someone who knows how to cook a meal that doesn’t involve frozen ingredients? If she can’t cook for you, how is she going to cook for your child? She won’t. DCF/DSS will be feeding your child while updating statuses on Facebook about how women make less than men for the same work. Hopefully your income is high enough to hire a maid, because women, well feminists, nowadays have no skills to properly raise another human being.

When society eventually does collapse of feminism, I want to hear the excuses that feminists have offer for the decline, especially since they got absolutely everything they wanted. I hope I’m alive when it all comes crashing down.

I often seriously consider unfollowing the “feminism” tag when I encounter posts like this. Part of me really wanted to go back to my dashboard and forget I ever saw this post. But no. I won’t. I can’t. I’ve had enough. So here we go: 6 Reasons Why You Clearly Don’t Understand Feminism and Need to Stop Being Oppressive.

1. ’Feminism makes women think all they need to do to succeed in life is “be a woman.” ’ Oops! Actually, feminism is about believing that a person’s ability to “succeed in life” has nothing to do with gender identity. Currently, this is not so. Not only do cisgender women on average make somewhere around a quarter on the dollar less than cisgender men, but success in  many male-dominated occupations still remains largely inaccessible to many women because of sexism. Also, feminists don’t tend to blame “the feminine condition” (which I take to mean “possessing female reproductive organs”) for anything, but rather society in general for considering “the feminine condition” subpar to “the male condition.”

2. “Feminists are proud to be ugly.” Many feminists are proud, that’s for sure. Let me ask you this, what do you possibly hope to gain by calling another person “ugly?” And isn’t it true that many people disagree on what is “ugly” and what is “beautiful?” Feminism perpetuates the idea that every body is beautiful, and that people all of all genders should be proud of themselves and their bodies. I mean, doesn’t that sound a lot better for everybody? You say that it has “taught women that it’s okay to look like they just rolled out of bed,” but what would be accurate is that it has taught women that it’s okay to look however they damn please. Why is the business of others, of total strangers, to judge another person based on their looks? Here’s the thing: it’s not. Which means that it’s not your business if a woman is obese. It’s not your business if she has short hair, or long hair, or purple hair. It’s not your business if she has hair on her legs or her armpits or pubic area. Or if she is wearing a short skirt, or pajamas. It’s not your business.

You say men are attracted to beauty and always will be? First of all, ask most feminists, and they’d tell you that how they look has nothing to do with dressing for a man, or for anyone else but themselves. Also, try to remember that plenty of women aren’t interested in men, and you shouldn’t exclude them that way (Feminism is about that, too). Secondly, it’s a pretty bleak outlook on people in general to say that we are only attracted to beauty. Could you fall in love with someone based solely on their looks? Some people can, I suppose, but most of us need to connect with a person on a more emotional or intellectual level, too. And finally: beauty is subjective. Even if you are dressing to appeal to another person, different looks appeal to different people.

3. “Feminists are stuck up, argumentative, and difficult.” We are only “argumentative” when others are ignorant and oppressive. And we are only “difficult” when it is difficult to prove us wrong, difficult (or impossible) to stop us. But maybe you mean that women shouldn’t be argumentative? That women should be more “lady like” or “docile?” See, another part of feminism is saying to hell with those gender-restrictive, constructed stereotypes. If a male-identifying person can assert his opinion or stand up for himself and be called “strong,” why is it that when a woman does the same thing, she is “overbearing” or “a bitch?”

4. “Feminists have trouble finding a partner that is equal or above to their level.” Um, what? This point made the least amount of sense to me. “Feminism has given women more money while taking away their biological need to have a family?” Sorry, but what? It’s true that feminism has helped in shrinking the wage gap between “men” and “women” (not that those are the only two genders), but not nearly to the point where women make more than men, or even close to equal. And women don’t have a “biological need” to get married and have children. Some women don’t even have the biological capability to have children, and someone don’t have a uterus or ovaries or a vagina. By saying that women “need” to have children, you are reducing a woman’s worth to her baby-making abilities. Do you find sterile women useless? What about menopausal women? No? Why don’t you stop judging the lifestyles of others? As in, why do you give a fuck if women have a partner or not? Seriously, why do you care? Some women don’t want partners, and some women (and many feminists) have no problem finding a partner who is compatible to them and their beliefs. You happen to be looking at one.

As for the “threatening the fabric of society” thing, give me a break. Did you just imply that every job taken by a woman is a job lost by a man? Did you just imply that women have no place in the workforce and therefore suggest that the only “place” for a woman is to stay home and take care of children?

5. “Feminists overvalue alpha males.” Oops, wait. This is the one that made the least amount of sense. “The majority of men have been brainwashed by the feminist message?” Where did you get that notion, because the majority of the men (and almost as many women) I interact seem to think that feminism is either a joke or a useless, outdated movement. And uh, using words like “pussy” to mean “weak” is just plain sexist, because it implies that identifying as a woman or having female anatomy makes you a lesser person. Feminism is ruining the world, huh? Nope, looks like it’s actually internalized misogyny.

6. “Feminists are going to be unfit mothers who don’t know how to take care of a household.” Well, it looks like you were actually implying that the only “place” for a woman is to stay home and take care of children! Oh, and feminism is what’s holding women back? OKAY. 

But beyond what I already said in #4, there’s still a lot wrong with this part. “If she can’t cook for you, how is she going to cook for your child?” Why is she expected to cook for you? Why is she expected to be the sole caretaker for a child that she and her partner are equally responsible for? Why are you once again assuming that a woman’s role is always caretaker? Sorry, but fuck that. 

So to conclude, clearly feminism isn’t what’s “destroying women or society.” So what is? Misogyny. Sexism. Gender-restrictive stereotypes. Lack of choice when it comes to a woman’s body and choices. Oh, and people like you, who enforce all of those things.


So I was thinking about unfollowing 10knotes because they can&#8217;t seem to stop posting things that piss me off. But maybe I should keep following, because I keep getting gems like this.

Listen up readers, Disney writers, and society in general. By perpetuating the idea that women* don&#8217;t mean the things they say, you are essentially condoning actions that remove a woman&#8217;s* voice/choice.

I was planning on ranting for a while, but that&#8217;s pretty much the bottom line. You don&#8217;t get to decide what a woman* means, you should respect what she has to say and not question or doubt her, especially not because of her gender.

So I was thinking about unfollowing 10knotes because they can’t seem to stop posting things that piss me off. But maybe I should keep following, because I keep getting gems like this.

Listen up readers, Disney writers, and society in general. By perpetuating the idea that women* don’t mean the things they say, you are essentially condoning actions that remove a woman’s* voice/choice.

I was planning on ranting for a while, but that’s pretty much the bottom line. You don’t get to decide what a woman* means, you should respect what she has to say and not question or doubt her, especially not because of her gender.

(Source: isthemusictoblame)


When is it going to end?

I was sitting at the bus stop today, listening to yet another girl-on-girl hate conversation. Heard sentences like “I didn’t think she was the sorority girl type” and “I couldn’t live with all girls, girls just cause so much drama” and “she doesn’t dress well enough to be in a sorority.” And I just sat there, getting increasingly tempted to interject my (probably unwanted) two cents.

Femininity is sometimes its biggest critic. And I understand that this is a media- and society-fueled concept, I understand that girls attacking other girls is something that we are taught to do, that we are not generally born with a knack for being hyper-critical to anyone or anything feminine. But we cannot expect things to change if we do not actively seek this change. Why must we critique the choices of women when we don’t know them or have insight into their mind? Why must it be our weapon of choice to criticize a female’s appearance? 

When is it going to end?

Judge a woman based on her personality, judge her based on what you hear her say, on what her political views are, on her favorite books or her opinion of contemporary sculpture or the attitude with which she approaches life. Do not pretend to understand what “type” of woman she is, and make judgements on her based on your prejudice. Resist the urge to critique her appearance before anything else. Do not reduce her to a flat, simple image. Do not attempt to erase her complexity or her story. She is worth far more than that, and you owe her (and yourself) far more than that.